fredag 16 november 2018

Kaj Bernhard Genell, Kafka and the kafkaesque ( 2017 )

   THE uniqueness of the works of Franz Kafka and the perplexing historical accuracy of the concept of the Kafkaesque are both phenomena that over the years have been noticed by many readers and scholars. This book sets out to unravel the enigma of this very concept, by reference to the process of creation, and to Kafka´s implicit use of two unconscious levels within the universe of discourse of his most important works. Always a fruitful explanation of the uniqueness of these works has been missing. Scholars have ever since the 1930s been noticing the extraordinary qualities of the Kafka text. Strange - Kafkaesque - features have been attributed to the short stories and the novels of Kafka. The Kafka hero has - rightly - been seen as a mere figure, and the " dream-like " landscape-universe has been seen as characteristic, and one has frequently been looking upon these entities, together with a few stylistic features, as technical dominants in the shaping of the concept of the Kafkaesque.

This book displays a model, together with a biographical survey and a historical perspective on possible influences, that, quite reversely, forms a hermeneutic explanation to these features, as well as to what is denoted by the concept. This is achieved from the perspective of a dynamic contextual center, explained in a model containing three levels, levels steadily forming the discourse, typical of Kafka.

The veil of mystery may never be lifted when it comes to Kafka´s classics of Modernity. It might be essential to know about the technique behind the Kafkaesque to be able to reflect upon the Self-consciousness of Modern Man of the 20th century, a century so intensely marked by a dialogue between society and the works and ideas of Sigmund Freud.

Self-consciousness of Man, as it appeared with St. Augustine, the great Italian Renaissance writers, Erasmus, Shakespeare, Montaigne, the German secular Romantics and Hegel, swiftly developed into something even much more complex with the appearance of Freud and the publication of his Traumdeutung in the year of 1900, and, more so, with the creation of the Kafkaesque, with the works of Kafka, around 1912.


The work of mine displays a distinct answer to the question regarding the uniqueness of Kafka and regarding the concept of the kafkaesque and how Kafka managed to achieve this very effect of the Kafkaeasque through his special technique. My work is an attempt to look for the meaning of the use of the kafkaic style. The uniqueness of the kafkaesque is noticed by many others but here it is explained by reference to the process of creation of the kafkaesque. Through the years this explanation has been missing. Kafka´s uses two unconscious levels in his major works. Sholars like W. Benjamin, Th. Adorno, M. Walser and H. Hiebel have noticed the extraordinary experienced qualities of the kafka text, the strange features owned by the hero, the hero as a mere figure and the “dream-like” universe. But I am displaying a model that can bring these features into a dynamic scheme, explained from an author´s ( albeit unconscious ) view.

It is in fact essential for Modern Man - FOR US - to be aware of this technique, to be able to reflect on the picture of Modern Man. Kafka was part of the creation of THE Self-conscience in the 20ieth century, marked by a constant dialogue with Freud and his works. Self-conscience as Man knew it since St. Augustine, the Italian renaissance writers, Erasmus, Shakespeare and Montaigne and later with the secular Romantics and Hegel, swiftly in Modrnism developed into something much more complex with the appearance of Freud and the publication of the Traumdeautung in the year of 1900. And Kafka fulfilled it all. The works of Kafka appeared as a reaction to 1.) Modern times, to 2.) his own personal alienation and to 3.) Freud.

Kafka´s answer to Modernity – to the modern condition – was an astonishingly complex one, but it turned out to be very accurate and accomplished right from the very beginning. When other reactions to the modern condition, like Dada, displayed a picture of a chaotic and a rebel attitude to reason and morals, Kafka, like Rimbaud, showed a far more complex ability to encompass the soul of humans in relation to the Modern society in a universal form.
Kafka´s relation to Freud was somewhat like that of a relation of a son to the father. Thus Kafka did not acknowledge Freud´s discoveries, interpretations, methods and notions as truths. But he saw them – ironically – as facts. And in a sense they were. Freud´s views were historical facts in their deep influence on mind and society of the century. Hence Kafka used Freud as part of the Modern Myth.

Kafka did not “believe in” Freud, but he was fascinated by him. He did not study Freud at great extent, but he had – like many others – acquired a sort of immediate understanding of his ideas, through a kind of everyday osmosis.

Kafka started out as a writer of lyrical prose, short prose poems. But his dream was to write a novel, and it should be a novel like the one Flaubert ( Kafka´s literary idol ) wanted to write: a very beautiful book about nothing at all. It also seems as he wanted to develop the style of Tieck and the Romantics. So it turned out that Kafka now developed a technique for writing novels where he was extending a sole situation into a perfectly static ( i.e. nothing ) drama displaying a struggle between conscious and unconscious. Using his extraordinary ( perhaps autistic ) sensibility his technique, the kafkaic, miraculously was born in 1912 with the writing of the short story of The Verdict. He asked his fiancée Felice for the meaning of it.

Later, with the writing of the unfinished The Trial, his technique of displaying the Kafkaesque was already full-fledged. Here he – almost FORCE by his own personal and social catastrophe - introduced a pseudo plot in a kind of pseudo novel displaying a story of a split, a struggle of a conscious instance of a person, shown as a hero-figure battling this person´s OWN unconscious. As it turned out, this battle originated – caused - a second unconscious part to appear in the universe of this fiction. It seems that the hero-figure, devoid of his unconscious, HAD TO develop such an unconscious to be able to handle his surrounding world, which was his original unconscious. Here we thus are having a triadic structure and a strange meeting of two unconscious instances.

This fictional condition primarily results in a double exposure of the unconscious and secondly in a strange transcendence of the Ego, which cannot easily be reflected upon, since it has no equivalent in reality.

As a result of this kafkaic technique, which probably was unconscious (!) to Kafka himself, we are also – apart from the nausea of double unconscious, a kind of the self-consciousness of the unconscious - experiencing a very intense poetry displaying utter loneliness and in a framwork : a sad pseudo-protest against the super power of civil organization and law in general as well as a melancholy beauty of existence. The like of which never again has been created. Cf. www.kajgenell.com/index.html

torsdag 15 november 2018

Bild

The Beauty


Chapter One



It looked like it was going to be another perfect day in this perplexingly hot Swedish summer. On one early morning in June, exactly half a year since he was released from a county prison after serving time for committing a theft of a dire painting, a Rembrandt alas!, at an art museum, Edward woke up in his bed with a strange thought in his head:
”Content is something very small.” The old man looked at the clock that was standing on the bookcase, which was placed right across the room, approximately ten feet from his bed. It was 07.00 AM. At the same time he got a glimpse from the book which he had placed on the bedside table the night before. Actually he had only managed to read one single page in it and this was, he thought, due to the extraordinary tricky language in it, he thought. The book was an early novel by Joseph Conrad. JC was one of the greatest writers of all time. And what Edward was thinking right now was precisely that content in novels usually is something very small





Form is, by contrast, something more important. This idea wasn´t really his, but came from a boo by Sartre, the title of which he had long forgotten. He was very good at forgetting things nowadays. The notion presented by Jean-Paul Sartre wasn´t very strange or remarkable per se, but it was a strange notion to wake up with.

   Edward Tegelkrona had expected to wake at sunrise. The alarm was set just as a precaution. Now he woke at 07.00 AM and to top it all right out of a dream. He noticed that was all sweaty on his chest. Then he remembered:

   The dream hadn´t at all been about Sartre, but it had had to do with a re-meeting with old buddies from his time in the Army. But in the dream all of them had been assembled in a small flea market in a suburb, like the ones organized by the Missionary Churches. Edward had been buying an old infantry cap from a poor collection of hats managed by a very old spinster in black, and it was an infantry cap, from which it was clear that it was a cap of a Private Second Class. But Edward himself, in the dream, knew he himself actually was a Corporal. And this, while many old-age comrades from the old good times irradiated around him, snapping, stuttering and arguing about all their peculiar hobbies, which they had acquired as retirees, not to succumb to sin, drinking and sadness. Thus, an older white-haired companion, with great tattoos, - Edward hadn´t the slightest idea who he was - , had begun to cultivate small mice as a pastime. The former comrade explained decently and with an intense, ridiculous and intrusive seriousness how crucial it was for the half-rats to have walls in their housing, perforated with small holes for the sake of ventilation. Suddenly the whole antiquarian-like room was completely flooded by these little animals, irrigating here and there, plaguing the retirees, who occasionally mentioned their memories of canteens, kettles, hand grenades, and pea soup. But Edward could not in any way get rid of the silly cap. Without wasting more time on trying to remember more of the dream, even though it certainly had a significant message, Edward pulled off the white t-shirt and stretched out for a new one that he had already placed on the big radio close by on the previous night. The radio was a big, black, more than 20 years old, JVC radio device, standing next to his bed. He now swung his legs to the floor while listening to the brittle summer noises from the birds and the bikes from outside softly intruding into his flat by the left-open balcony door. He had placed his large, pale feet on the naked floor but could not perceive weather it was cold or not due to the damages caused to his nerve ends in legs and feet caused by excessive smoking and use of alcohol as well as misuse of medical drugs.

   He heard the engine of a motorcycle down on the street. “I guess it is Spontlav.” Edward said to himself. Spontlav was one of his neighbours, living at the 1st floor, that drove an old Harley Davidson.

  It was a very peaceful summer´s morning. It was all very nice and tender. Little did Edward know what had been going on in the house during the early hours.

  Perhaps as a sign of hesitation before the activities of the day Edward´s dull gaze again fell on the book by Conrad. “Imagine no longer being able to read a book!” he contorted while he wept his nose with the back side of his left hand, but he soon evaded this thought, since he thought he would not disgrace himself by starting this beautiful day negatively. He harked, snarled and panted, as was his habit, and then looked theatrically at the window and the balcony door, where light softly entered. Sometimes, when his mind was ambivalent, which often was the case, he almost felt sighted. Somewhere inside, he thought he no longer was able to concentrate as much as needed to be able to properly read books.

- “Ah, he cried out. The weather is super!”

   Aside from sleeping Edward´s favorite occupation nowadays was the taking of long walks. Reading books was, according to Tegelkrona, something that belonged to the youth.  Leon Battista Alberti, the inventor of perspective and an erudite humanist  in Renaissance Italy, did not read a single book after the age of thirty.

   The weather on this Monday was very favorable to Edward’s plan for this day, a plan which consisted in the rather pleasant activity of delivering two small plastic pots containing small Monstera Deliciosa plants to his younger sister, living in Billdal at the other site of the town. His sister, Janina Blingstav-Tungspetz, married to Jan-Albin Tungspetz, wasn´t at home today but resided with her daughter in a bungalow in the southern parts of Halland, by the sea. But Edward had the key to Janina´s place. It would of course had been much nicer to meet with Janina, but it was under all circumstances a pleasant task to have, this delivering flowers to her for a retiree like Edward, especially when the weather was such a marvel. The paper bag with the two pots in it waited apt in the hall. The Monstera Deliciosas had long been under permanent ban of the EU, because they were considered to be poisonous. During many years you could get hold of a single Monstera anywhere in Sweden in any store at all. If you eat leaves of Monsteras, you will end up dead, especially if you are a child. But now the ban was lifted, and Janina had no children of small age any longer. The house where Edward resided was an old functionalist one, built during the 2nd World War. Many houses around looked just like Edward´s and all of them were situated on a hill, quite in the centre of Gothenburg. In the areas between the houses there were lawns with trees and lots of greenery, playing grounds for children, small parking lots, and … nothing more. The area of houses, although it was all inhabited, seemed all deserted. The parking places were very few, but the whole area was designed and prospected long ago, when not everyone drove around in the city in a car.
>>>>>>>>>>>






onsdag 14 november 2018

Spiken i kistan för SD

SD visar att dom inte har nån politik. Nu minskar stödet snabbt.

SD visar sitt ansikte. Tomt.

SD visar sitt tomma ansikte. Jag är höger säger SD, men jag har egentligen ingen politik alls, säger SD. Så jag behövs inte. All politik finns redan hos dom andra, säger SD. Så när nästa val kommer så röstar ingen på mig, för jag har ingen politik.

lördag 10 november 2018

Vad är en oklar tanke?

Vad är en oklar tanke? Om man håller med om Wittgenstein, när denne menar:"Allt som kan tänkas kan tänkas klart.", tänker man då klart? Ty kan det alls finnas någon oklar tanke? Kan något tänkas oklart. Är det inte definitionen på entanke att den skall ha en - klar - innebörd? Hur ser en oklar tanke ut?

tisdag 6 november 2018

Ohistoriskt om general Tojo.

Såg just en anglosaxisk dokumentär om "historiens onda män". Om general Tojo. En totalt ohistorisk och lögnaktig bild målades upp av japanen. Denne gjorde exakt vad alla andra generaler gjort i alla tider. Varken mer eller mindre. Men han blev hängd för det.

Rättvisans villkor.

Tänk om det aldrig nånsin hade funnits människor som hade pläderat för en rättvis fördelning! Om aldrig nån kommit på ens skuggan av en idé om rättvisa. Om aldrig någon nånsin hade valt att lita på någon annan men bara tänkt på sig själv. Ack ja, tänk på hur enkelt man då hade levt. Var och en för sig själv, och inga civilisationer. Då hade man inte förstört mark och vatten och luft med en massa onödiga byggen och aktiviteter. Det är med idén om rättvisan som alla dessa orättvisa civilisationer byggts. Ty utan tanken på rättvisa hade man aldrig uppfunnit så oändligt mycket skräp. Om man inte hade trott att det skulle gagna både en själv och mänskligheten. Så kan man säga att det är idén om rättvisa och idén om solidaritet som har gjort att vi nu hotas av undergång. Eller har jag missuppfattat något?
Det är, som synes, svårt att föreställa sig saker och saklägen som man aldrig upplevt.
Som mannen sa: Det är omöjligt att förklara en orgasm för någon som aldrig haft någon.
Kvinnan: Jag får orgasm varje gång någon förklarar något för mig.
Ibland försvarar människor sitt orättvisa beteende med orden:"Livet självt är orättvist." Och när man säger att alla människor har lika värde, så får man till svar:" Så du är lika mycket värd som Bill Gates? Nog är han värd en och annan dollar mer?"
Ann Heberlein menar att det är ett resultat av "banal godhet" att ge en tiggare en peng. Med detta menar hon att det i längden är en icke-god handling.
Vad är då det rätta?
Ja, kanske är det flera saker. Samtidigt. Och det viktiga är att det rätta, i meningen det som har med rättvisa att göra, ofta är något som har med ekonomi att göra. Det har ofta med ekonomi och med kapitalism att göra.
Att det var på det viset, det anade en gång den lille pianoläraren från Schweiz, Jean Jacques Rousseau, som när han skrivit sina böcker om att människan borde gå tillbaka till naturen, samt att all uppfostran var fel, suckade och i en liten essä skrev att han inte hade mycket att råda mänskligheten, alls. Ty han menade att han själv saknade en viktig kunskap. Han förstod sig inte på ekonomi.Och, skrev han, om man inte förstår ekonomi, så har man inget att säga till människor.
I detta så var nu Rousseau oändligt klok. Mycket klokare än Kant. Kanske till och med klokare än Marx. Rousseau överdrev. Han menade inte att man inte kunde yttra sig om människovärde utan att kunna ekonomi. Men kanske menade han att man behövde kunna ekonomi för att kunna förverkliga rättvisa.
Godheten kan aldrig vara banal. Godheten är bara SVÅR. Den är svårare än man tror. Det är det svåra som ofta är gott. Inte det enkla. Det svåra är ofta det att vara försiktig. Man måste vara försiktig med att säga att allt är för sent. Kanske är det den som säger att allt är för sent, eller att godhet kan vara banal, som gör den största skadan.
Med den egendomliga struktur, som begreppen "god" och "rätt" befinner sig i, så är det kanske en vis sak, att inte få orgasm varje gång man hör en förklaring, eftersom förklaringen oftast är fel. Få människor får orgasm av tålamod, och det är kanske det största felet med människor. Den som har tålamod inser att ekonomi inte har att göra med att tjäna pengar, men att fördela rättvist och över lång tid.
Varenda idiot kan bli miljonär! Få är däremot de, som kan se till så att man inte pinkar i andras mat.

Regeringsbildningen eller redigeringsbilden?

bland undrar man för vem hela denna såpopera redigeras. Alla vet ju att Löfvén får fortsätta. Han leder det största partiet. Så kom inte och säg att ni inte blir lurade. Det värsta är att media alltså ägnar sig åt att redigera, och åt pseudonyheter, istället för åt att granska kapitalismen.

onsdag 10 oktober 2018

Franz Kafka and the Kafkaesque.





Franz Kafka and the Kafkaesque.







                The work of mine displays a distinct answer to the question regarding the uniqueness of Kafka and regarding the concept of the kafkaesque and how Kafka managed to achieve this very effect of the Kafkaeasque through his special technique. My work is an attempt to look for the meaning of the use of the kafkaic style. The uniqueness of the kafkaesque is noticed by many others but here it is explained by reference to the process of creation of it. Through the years this explanation has been missing.        

      Kafka uses two unconscious levels in his major works. Sholars like W. Benjamin, Th. Adorno, M. Walser and H. Hiebel have noticed the extraordinary experienced qualities of the kafka text, the strange features owned by the hero, the hero as a mere figure and the “dream-like” universe. But I am displaying a model that can bring these features into a dynamic scheme, explained from an author´s ( albeit unconscious ) view.  

         Now – for the first time – the veil of mystery can be lifted with concern to these classical works of Modernity.

         It is in fact essential for Modern Man to be aware of this technique, to be able to reflect on the picture of Modern Man. Kafka was part of the creation of THE self-conscience in the 20ieth century, marked by a constant dialogue with Freud and his works. Self-conscience as Man knew it since St. Augustine, the Italian renaissance writers, Erasmus, Shakespeare and Montaigne and later with the secular Romantics and Hegel, swiftly in Modrnism developed into something much more complex with the appearance of Freud and the publication of the Traumdeautung in the year of 1900. And Kafka fulfilled it all.

                Kafka appeared as a reaction to 1.) Modern times, to 2.) his own personal alienation and to 3.) Freud. Kafka´s answer to Modernity – to the modern condition – was an astonishingly complex one, but it turned out to be very accurate and accomplished right from the very beginning. When other reactions to the modern condition, like Dada, displayed a picture of a chaotic and a rebel attitude to reason and morals, Kafka, like Rimbaud, showed a far more complex ability to encompass the soul of humans in relation to the Modern society in a universal form.

                Kafka´s relation to Freud was somewhat like that of a relation of a son to the father. Thus Kafka did not acknowledge Freud´s discoveries, interpretations, methods and notions as truths. But he saw them – ironically – as facts. And in a sense they were. Freud´s views were historical facts in their deep influence on mind and society of the century. Hence Kafka used Freud as part of the Modern Myth.

               FK did not “believe in” Freud, but he was fascinated by him. He did not study Freud at great extent, but he had – as many – acquired an immediate understanding of his ideas, through everyday osmosis.



               Kafka started out as a writer of lyrical prose, short prose poems. But his dream was to write a novel, and it should be a novel like the one Flaubert ( Kafka´s literary idol ) wanted to write: a very beautiful book about nothing at all. It also seems as he wanted to develop the style of Tieck and the Romantics. So it turned out that Kafka now developed a technique for writing novels where he was extending a sole situation into a perfectly static ( i.e. nothing ) drama displaying a struggle between conscious and unconscious. Using his extraordinary ( perhaps autistic ) sensibility his technique, the kafkaic, miraculously was born in 1912 with the writing of the short story of The Verdict. He asked his fiancée Felice for the meaning of it.



      Later, with the writing of the unfinished The Process, his technique of displaying the Kafkaesque was already full-fledged. Here he – almost FORCE by his own personal and social catastrophe - introduced a pseudo plot in a kind of pseudo novel displaying a story of a split, a struggle of a conscious instance of a person, shown as a hero-figure battling this person´s OWN unconscious. As it turned out, this battle originated – caused - a second unconscious part to appear in the universe of this fiction. It seems that the hero-figure, devoid of his unconscious, HAD TO develop such an unconscious to be able to handle his surrounding world, which was his original unconscious. Here we thus are having a triadic structure and a strange meeting of two unconscious instances.

         This fictional condition primarily results in a double exposure of the unconscious and secondly in a strange transcendence of the Ego, which cannot easily be reflected upon, since it has no equivalent in reality.

         As a result of this kafkaic technique, which probably was unconscious (!) to Kafka himself, we are also – apart from the nausea of double unconscious, a kind of the self-consciousness of the unconscious - experiencing a very intense poetry displaying utter loneliness and in a framwork : a sad pseudo-protest against the super power of civil organization and law in general as well as a melancholy beauty of existence. The like of which never again has been created.


Now is the time!

torsdag 4 oktober 2018

tänker jag då: Politiskt läge likt en krokodil,m.m., och vad är I...

tänker jag då: Politiskt läge likt en krokodil,m.m., och vad är I...: Det politiska läget är lika intressant som en krokodil i en damm. Krokodilen= politikerna. Varför öda tid på att stå och luta sig mot barriä...

Autumn in New York played by Kaj B. Genell on a Roland fp-4, 2018-10-04.

https://soundcloud.com/kajgenell/autumn-in-new-york-dukelsky

Politiskt läge likt en krokodil,m.m., och vad är INTE krokodillikt då?

Det politiska läget är lika intressant som en krokodil i en damm. Krokodilen= politikerna. Varför öda tid på att stå och luta sig mot barriären invid dammen och undra över vad den i damms mitt lurande krokodilen tänker? Bättre är att vara beredd på att agera när den rör sig. Om den försöker hoppa över barriären och äta upp mig, om fyra veckor, då skall jag vara beredd. Då KAN jag agera. Innan dess, varför bry sig. Ingen vet vad krokodilen tänker. Först när den kommer upp ur dammen, DÅ kan man börja fundera. Vad gör vi nu?
Maken till sysslande med pseudohändelser får man leta efter?
Svenska Akademin är som en krokodil i en damm. Varför öda tid på att stå där invid barriären ......

Något som INTE är som en krokodils tankar, som inte är pseudoprat, det är däremot överbefolkningen och klimatfrågan. Nä, där måste man man inse att det är dags att försöka räkna ut vad alla , DU,DU och DU, tänker i frågan, samt att söka påverka från sekund ett. Ty DÄR har det betydelse. Det kan vara skillnaden som mellan 0 och 1.

Jag mötte en man en gång som sa ( eller jag har själv drömt det ...) :" Min vanföreställning är att jag är galen." Ack, du den klokaste av dem alla! Hur kär är du mig inte. Om än hela världen hade en sådan insikt!

torsdag 27 september 2018

En splitter ny bok om Franticek Kafka


Köp på Bokus https://www.bokus.com/bok/9789176998373/kafka-och-det-kafkaeska-det-dubbla-omedvetna/
eller:
på AdLibris  https://www.adlibris.com/se/bok/kafka-och-det-kafkaeska-det-dubbla-omedvetna-9789176998373





Nu har min bok om Kafka äntligen kommit på svenska. Boken är en bearbetning av min å Engelska skrivna Kafka and the kafkaesque från förra året (2017).
https://www.adlibris.com/se/e-bok/kafka-and-the-kafkaesque-9789177650591



INFORMATION OM BOKEN: "Kafka är en modern klassiker. Kanske mer än någon annan modernist definierade Kafka 1900-talet. Han gjorde det i mycket genom skapandet av det som kallas det "kafkaeska". Men vad är det kafkaeska?  Vad är det för ett begrepp? Hur kom begreppet till? Hur kunde Kafka skapa något som var så unikt, att det blev upphovet till ett begrepp? Det är bland annat dessa frågor som denna bok försöker ge svar på. Boken inleds med ett biografiskt avsnitt om Kafka. Sedan följer ett avsnitt innehållande en analys av det kafkaeska och av  grundstrukturen i Kafkas litterära teknik. I denna teknik är "det dubbla omedvetna" något centralt. Så blir också det då centrum för analysen."



---------------------------------------------------



OM FÖRFATTAREN TILL STUDIEN:"Kaj Bernhard Genell är född 1944. Han har tidigare gett ut aforismsamlingar, Ironi och existens ( Korpen,1983 ), Splittringar ( Korpen,1985 ) samt - på engelska - Kafka and the kafkaesque ( e-bok, Recito, 2017 ), av vilken boken Kafka och det kafkaeska är en senare bearbetning. Han skriver även skönlitteratur, och har på BoD publicerat romanen Pistolen (2018). Kaj Bernhard Genell bor i Göteborg, där han bl.a. under ett decennium på 1900-talet studerat humaniora vid stadens universitet."

Kaj Bernhard Genell, Kafka and the kafkaesque ( 2017 )

   T HE uniqueness of the works of Franz Kafka and the perplexing historical...